Michael D. Purzycki is an analyst, writer, and editor based in Arlington, Virginia. He has worked for the United States Navy, United States Marine Corps, and United States Army. In addition to Divergent Options, he has been published in the Center for Maritime Strategy, the Center for International Maritime Security, the Washington Monthly, The Liberal Patriot, The Defense Post, Merion West, Wisdom of Crowds, Braver Angels, and more. He can be found on Twitter at @MDPurzycki, and on Substack at The Non-Progressive Democrat. Divergent Options’ content does not contain information of an official nature nor does the content represent the official position of any government, any organization, or any group.
Title: Assessing the Benefits of a United States Foreign Legion
Date Originally Written: February 11, 2024.
Date Originally Published: March 4, 2024.
Author and / or Article Point of View: The author is advising the President of the United States on a potential way for the U.S. to stabilize conflict zones at a time where many American citizens are wary of extended deployments of U.S. ground forces.
Summary: Despite a general American desire not to fight overseas for extended periods of time, an unpredictable security environment calls for giving U.S. policymakers multiple options for forcibly defending American interests. The ability of Washington to sustain deployments of ground forces is hampered by a small recruiting pool and the political risk of American casualties. Creating a United States Foreign Legion is one potential way around these problems.
Text: With the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq receding from memory, it is understandable most Americans would not want to contemplate more extended deployments of United States ground forces overseas. However, the American public and their elected leaders can never be certain what conflicts will arise that threaten U.S. interests. While unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs, or drones) are often viewed as effective weapons in performing such missions as counterterrorism[1], there could be scenarios in which ground troops are needed to neutralize threats.
Unfortunately, the U.S. military faces a recruiting crisis that might hamper its ability to maintain a significant overseas deployment. Less than one quarter of Americans ages 17-24 are fit for military service[2] based on existing standards. Common reasons for unfitness are obesity, low academic achievement, alcohol and drug abuse, and mental health challenges. While each of these problems can and should be addressed for their own sake, even if significant efforts are made, it will likely take years before the percentage of young Americans fit for service significantly increases.
Furthermore, deploying Americans in uniform to far-flung locations entails political risk. Unless most civilians see a clear national security benefit to putting their fellow citizens in danger, public opinion may be critical of an extended deployment. Public opinion will likely become even more negative if U.S. service members are killed in action.
Private military contractors (PMCs), are one possible solution to the need for “boots on the ground.” The U.S. has extensively used PMCs in conflict zones such as Afghanistan and Iraq[3], providing an American presence without the political risk of long-lasting military deployments that are unpopular at home. PMC casualties get comparatively less media attention than the deaths of uniformed service members[4]. However, the fact that PMCs are ultimately more loyal to money as employees than to a nation-state can compromise their utility as a defender of specifically American interests. A rival like China or Russia can offer American-funded PMCs higher pay to induce them to turn against the U.S.
The experience of France offers another potential solution to the dilemma of a need for ground troops versus an aversion to casualties: the Foreign Legion. Unlike PMCs, this force – drawn from around the world – is part of the French military. Its members wear French uniforms, are commanded by French officers, and adhere to French regulations. After serving at least three years, or upon being wounded in action, a legionnaire is eligible for French citizenship[5]. The Foreign Legion gives France a valuable force at its disposal to protect French interests in trouble spots around the world[6].
There have been several conflicts in recent decades when a United States Foreign Legion (USFL) might have been useful. During the Rwandan genocide of 1994, President Bill Clinton chose not to intervene, in part because of U.S. military deaths in Somalia the previous year[7], the political backlash to which was so strong he withdrew U.S. troops from Somalia[8]. Had President Clinton had a USFL at the ready, he might have been more willing to put American boots on the ground to stop the massacre of Tutsis by Hutu militants. Similarly, given President Barack Obama’s self-professed regret of being unprepared to stabilize Libya after the overthrow of Muammar Qaddafi in 2011[9], having USFL forces at his command might have allowed him to stabilize the country with less political risk than the deployment of regular American troops. In a 2016 Washington Post op-ed, Sean McFate named the American-led fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria as a conflict in which an American foreign legion would be useful[10].
There are multiple ways the units within a USFL could be structured. In a 2023 article for Small Wars Journal, Tom Ordeman Jr. suggested placing a foreign legion under the United States Marine Corps and organizing it into units modeled on Marine Air Ground Task Forces[11]. Alternatively, the legion could be placed in the United States Army and consist of Infantry Brigade Combat Teams (IBCTs). The Army could even use the USFL to experiment with reorganization of units. For example, Daniel Vazquez in War on the Rocks in 2020 suggested reducing the number of infantry battalions in each IBCT from three to two, while reintroducing special troops battalions[12]. A USFL could be used as part of this experiment, or else the deployment of the USFL overseas could free up IBCTs for such an experiment.
While the death of any American in combat is tragic, there are times when sending Americans into combat is the least bad thing a U.S. President can do. In a democracy, the need to protect national security interests is weighed against citizens’ willingness, or lack thereof, to see their fellow citizens sent into conflict zones. Even though it runs the risk of fueling American cynicism regarding the deaths of non-Americans, creating a Foreign Legion to complement its existing Armed Forces is an option worthy of further exploration.
Endnotes:
[1] Johnston, Patrick B., and Anoop K. Sarbahi. “The Impact of US Drone Strikes on Terrorism in Pakistan.” International Studies Quarterly, Volume 60, Issue 2, June 2016, Pages 203–219. https://academic.oup.com/isq/article/60/2/203/1750218?login=false
[2] Novelly, Thomas. “Even More Young Americans Are Unfit to Serve, a New Study Finds. Here’s Why.” Military.com, September 28, 2022. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/09/28/new-pentagon-study-shows-77-of-young-americans-are-ineligible-military-service.html
[3] Stanton, Ellie, and Josh Frank. “Can’t Do With, Can’t Do Without: The Use of Private Military Contractors in U.S. War Efforts.” University of Colorado Boulder, March 2, 2020. https://www.colorado.edu/polisci/2020/03/02/cant-do-cant-do-without-use-private-military-contractors-us-war-efforts
[4] Schooner, Steven L. “Why Contractor Fatalities Matter.” George Washington University Law School, Autumn 2008. https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1061&context=faculty_publications
[5] We Are The Mighty. “5 surprising facts you probably didn’t know about the French Foreign Legion.” February 10, 2023. https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-trending/french-foreign-legion/
[6] Ministère des Armées. “The French Foreign Legion.” https://www.cheminsdememoire.gouv.fr/index.php/en/french-foreign-legion
[7] Baldauf, Scott. “Why the US didn’t intervene in the Rwandan genocide.” Christian Science Monitor, April 7, 2009. https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/2009/0407/p06s14-woaf.html
[8] Tisdall, Simon. “Mogadishu outrage puts Clinton in firing line.” Guardian, October 5, 1993. https://www.theguardian.com/world/1993/oct/05/usa.simontisdall1
[9] Tierney, Dominic. “The Legacy of Obama’s ‘Worst Mistake.’” Atlantic, April 15, 2016. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/04/obamas-worst-mistake-libya/478461/
[10] McFate, Sean. “We need an American Foreign Legion.” Washington Post, May 19, 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/we-need-an-american-foreign-legion/2016/05/19/9a04d24e-176e-11e6-9e16-2e5a123aac62_story.html
[11] Ordeman, Jr., Tom. “Legio Patria Nostra: A Blueprint For An American Foreign Legion.” Small Wars Journal, September 3, 2023. https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/legio-patria-nostra-blueprint-american-foreign-legion
[12] Vazquez, Daniel. “Is the Infantry Brigade Combat Team Becoming Obsolete?” War on the Rocks, April 17, 2020. https://warontherocks.com/2020/04/is-the-infantry-brigade-combat-team-becoming-obsolete/